Jockstrap In Australian Rules Football

Measures Policies and Strategies Arturo Frondizi (1958-1962)

Arturo Frondizi:

policy measures and strategies:

Creating a new and innovative speech, won the support of progressive forces and large sectors of the left. This was because in his speech apply ancient principles of radicalism, nationalism and populism. Following this, the military presented their opposition.
One of the most important strategies taken by the presidential candidate of the nation was to agree with Gen. Juan Domingo Peron, for the latter to advise his supporters to vote for the representative of the opposition (UCRI), in exchange for the lifting of the bans. This reinforces the opposition of the military command of Aramburu. Frondizi win the election this February 23, 1958 with 4 million votes. This weakened the government, because they needed to "buy" votes from the opposition party and as expected, eventually, ended recognized as a government without real power due to its illegitimacy.

Arturo Frondizi tried to avoid the opposition, in turn, issued contempt for parliamentary methods as "holding back" development. The military did not seem wrong that Frondizi break with the constitution and support such measures, but of course, could the opposition of other sectors.

managed to reconcile with the church building and supporting the "free education." This meant that education was not only privatized part of it, but universities could reach catolicísimo exercise, and be governed by it.

unions, after losing hope in the new regime began a process of mobilization to curb large-scale capitalist modernization program. But the business and, especially, the military closed ranks with the government could break the most strikes.
Upon return to legality, undertake a program to destabilize the government (which includes 3 general strikes in the 61). Opening Frondizi to integrate trade union leaders had failed. But, in return, union pressure to lift the ban did I end up breaking a fragile balance that kept the army outside the effective exercise of the government.

Meanwhile, the military is closely watching every movement of government. They were divided into two factions, one known as "legalistic" that he considered military pressure were legitimate but should be limited while maintaining the constitutional legality, the other line was anti-integrationist, with a tendency to take power.

When Frondizi, in a gesture of independence, met with Ernesto Guevara and decided not to condemn Cuba to the OAS, the reaction of the military and civil right was overwhelming. He was forced to sever relations.

Finally, the straw that broke the camel was the victory of Peronism, after being authorized by the government in elections for provincial governors. Which ended with federal intervention in the provinces won by the PJ and the arrest of Frondizi. So ended the first attempt developed in Argentina.

Arguably Frondizi opportunistic measures contented moments about (the military and right) and sometimes others (populist and leftist sectors). Precisely for this, I never could satisfy both at once. These populist measures, coupled with that flirting Frondizi had with populist sectors and lack of governance, reached the final right-wing opposition, giving the coup of 62.